Javier Millán, stopped being the defender of Leopoldo Borovski, the only detainee and suspected of killing Fiorella Aghem in San Vicente. The lawyer resigned to the defense because he said “he did not want to generate controversy in that town where he has many friends and did not want to be pointed out by the case.” He added that nothing is yet defined and that biological tests such as blood traces, human remains under the victim’s fingernails and everything that can be found at the crime scene will be decisive.
Javier Millán on Radio Libertad.
Javier Millán is a lawyer from Oreño who had been hired by Borovski’s father. As is his private friend in the first instance he said he could take the case but finally decided that the best generation to give up that defense.
The reasons were told by Millán on Radio Libertad. He said that many friends asked him not to make the defense because everything indicates that the boy is the culprit. “Fortunately, I have a good reputation as a lawyer and in San Vicente I was saying that if Millán was there, the boy was going to leave. This is not the case, “he added.
“Luckily I have the good fortune to say that I am good, hardworking, which does not mean that I take anyone out of jail. That is determined by a judge and not a lawyer no matter how good. The problem is that many friends called me that their children were wrong because they believed that with me Borovski was going to come out yes or yes. This made me rethink a lot and I spoke with the father and he understood me not to continue, “he said.
On the other hand, he explained that he did not have access to the file and that he spoke very little with the accused. “We decided with the father that Friday he did not picture and this week he was going to update me with the file. But then what I already told happened and I decided not to do the defense. “
Punctually of the case, he assured that nobody knows if he is guilty or not. There is important evidence but nothing definitive. “I believe that the best tests to solve such a crime are biological ones. Against that you can not do anything, one can say that he was on that particular day and witnesses ratify it. But if biological evidence of yours appears at the crime scene or the victim’s body, that’s it, “the lawyer added.
Regarding what he refers to with biological tests, he added that they can be traces of blood, marks, human remains on the victim’s nails, hair, in short, everything that allows establishing that a person was in a place and with someone .
The submit #FemicidioDeFiorella: “The biological tests are going to be decisive in this case,” said the criminal lawyer who resigned from Borovski’s defense, first on MisionesOnline .